IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
May 9, 2011
BILL QUIMBY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Seeborg United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL
Prior to the time defendants' motion to vacate the default judgment was granted, plaintiff moved to compel defendants to produce evidence of their compliance with an order precluding the corporate defendant from transferring or disposing of any assets except in the ordinary course of business, and the individual defendant from doing so except as required to meet ordinary household and personal expenses and necessities of life. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), this motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the hearing set for May 26, 2011 is vacated. In light of the default judgment having been set aside, plaintiff no longer has a cognizable interest in ensuring that defendants complied with the prior order, and it has pointed to no facts to warrant departing from the ordinary presumption that court orders have been obeyed. The motion is 2 therefore denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.