Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Brett Allen Bossingham and Elisabeth Ann Bossingham

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 9, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
BRETT ALLEN BOSSINGHAM AND ELISABETH ANN BOSSINGHAM,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge

ORDER RE APRIL 25, 2011 STATUS CONFERENCE

On April 25, 2011, the Court held a status conference in the above-captioned case. Assistant United States Attorneys Mark E. Cullers and Henry Z. Carbajal III personally appeared on behalf of the United States. Attorney Gary D. Fielder appeared telephonically on behalf of the defendants, Brett Allen Bossingham and Elisabeth Ann Bossingham, who personally appeared in court and out of custody.

For the reasons articulated by the Court on the record during the status conference, the Court Orders as follows:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' counsel shall confer on an agreed form of protective order;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit an agreed form of protective order, or, if the parties are unable to agree on a form of order, the parties' respective proposed forms of protective order, on or before May 2, 2011;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel Gary D. Fielder shall file a report with the Court regarding the status of potential conflicts of interest with respect to his representation of both defendants simultaneously, including any executed waivers of conflicts of interest, if applicable, on or before May 10, 2011;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a further status conference before the Court in the above-captioned matter is set for May 23, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time ;

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act from April 25, 2011 through and including May 23, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), as the public and the defendants' interest in a speedy trial is outweighed by the ends of justice served by affording the defendants adequate time for the receipt and review of discovery and trial preparation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110509

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.