Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, A Delaware Corporation v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 10, 2011

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, DEUTSCHE BANK ALEX. BROWN, A DIVISION OF DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC., AND DEUTSCHE BANK AG,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge

PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT 14 CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES 15

Cypress filed a complaint with this Court on February 10, 2011 against Defendants 7 Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., Deutsche Bank Alex.Brown, and Deutsche Bank AG. The initial 8 CMC is currently scheduled for Friday, May 13, 2011. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 9 Procedure 4(m), Plaintiff is in the process of serving the Defendants. Plaintiff served Deutsche 10 Bank Securities, Inc. on May 5, 2011 and expects to complete service on all Defendants by 11 Friday, May 13, 2011. Therefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court continue the 12 initial CMC sixty (60) days until Tuesday, July 12, 2011 or as soon thereafter as is convenient 13 for the Court. Plaintiff further requests that the deadlines associated with the initial CMC also be 14 continued for sixty (60) days, including the deadlines to meet and confer with Defendants, to file 15 an ADR Certification, to file a Rule 26(f) Report, and to file a Case Management Statement.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11, Plaintiff Cypress Semiconductor Corporation ("Cypress") hereby moves the Court for an Order continuing the Initial Case Management Conference ("CMC") and associated deadlines in the above-captioned case. Cypress makes this motion on the grounds that Plaintiff recently served one defendant and is in the process of serving the other two defendants, and as a result, holding the CMC as currently scheduled would be premature.

Dated: May 5, 2011 LAW OFFICE OF PHILIP J. WANG By: /s/ Philip J. Wang Counsel for Plaintiff Cypress Semiconductor Corp.

Case management conference continued to 6/17/11 at 10:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110510

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.