Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Sourapha Chanhkhiao

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 10, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
SOURAPHA CHANHKHIAO,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

Date: June 10, 2011

Time: 9:00 a.m.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JASON HITT, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and COURTNEY FEIN, attorney for SOURAPHA CHANHKHIAO, that the status conference hearing date of May 6, 2011 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on June 10, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review the discovery, consult with her client, examine possible defenses, and continue investigating the facts of the case. Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of signing of this order through and including June 10, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

DATED: May 10, 2011.

Respectfully submitted, DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Public Defender COURTNEY FEIN Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for SOURAPHA CHANHKHIAO DATED: May 10, 2011. BENJAMIN WAGNER United States Attorney Courtney Fein for JASON HITT First Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff ORDER UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the May 6, 2011, status conference hearing be continued to June 10, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time up to and including the June 10, 2011 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge

20110510

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.