Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Louis Chacon v. City of San Jose

May 11, 2011

LOUIS CHACON PLAINTIFF(S),
v.
CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL.
DEFENDANT(S).



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge

*E-FILED 05-11-2011*

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

[Re: Docket No. 6]

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

✔9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

✔9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.