UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
May 12, 2011
RAYMOND J. CASTAIN,
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Raymond Castain's in forma pauperis application. On 10 April 19, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff to a written consent to Magistrate Judge James' 11 jurisdiction or request for reassignment to a district judge. Plaintiff has failed to respond by the May 12 10, 2011 deadline.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district court are manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.
designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by Magistrate Judge 16 James may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the
You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and 19 disposition. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall inform the Court whether he consents to Magistrate Judge James' jurisdiction or requests reassignment to a United States District Judge for trial. A copy of 21 both the consent and declination forms may be obtained from the Northern District of California's 22 website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/. From the homepage, choose "Forms" and then "Civil 23 Forms." The consent/declination form shall be filed by May 26, 2011. Failure to comply with this 24 Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of Plaintiff's case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
U U U
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.