Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jermaine Lee v. K. Harrington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 13, 2011

JERMAINE LEE,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
K. HARRINGTON,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 12)/ CLERK TO CLOSE CASE ORDER

Plaintiff Jermaine Lee ("Plaintiff"), a state inmate, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United State Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

This action was filed on September 3, 2009. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff's original complaint was dismissed with leave to amend on January 6, 2011. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and was warned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.) Plaintiff did not file anything.

On February 25, 2011, the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal of action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 12.) The Magistrate Judge warned Plaintiff that if he failed to comply, this action would be dismissed. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an Objection to the Findings and Recommendations. Well over thirty days passed and, to date, Plaintiff has failed to file an objection or otherwise respond. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local rule 305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Because Plaintiff never filed an amended complaint, this action is subject to dismissal for Plaintiff's failure to state a claim, as set forth in the Court's January 6, 2011 Order, and also subject to dismissal for Plaintiff's failure to comply with that same Order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 25, 2011, is ADOPTED;

2. The instant action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim and failure to comply with a Court Order;

3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case; and

4. This case shall count as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

b9ed48

20110513

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.