The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge
R.REX PARRIS LAW FIRM R. Rex Parris, Esq. (SBN 96567) Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Alexander R. Wheeler, Esq. (SBN 239541) Email: email@example.com Jason P. Fowler, Esq. (SBN 239426) Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Kitty Szeto, Esq. (SBN 258136) Email: email@example.com Douglas Han Esq. (SBN 232858) Email: firstname.lastname@example.org 42220 10th Street West, Suite 109 Lancaster, California 93534 Telephone: (661) 949-2595 Facsimile: (661) 949-7524 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Alfred L. Sanderson, Jr., Esq. (SBN 186071) Email: email@example.com Lindsay S. Fitch, Esq. (SBN 238227) Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Sophia Kwan, Esq. (SBN 257666) Email: email@example.com 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 Sacramento, California 95814-4428 Telephone: (916) 448-0159 Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 Attorneys for Defendant
CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT FOSTER POULTRY FARMS,INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS
Date: May 26, 2011 Time: 8:30 a.m. Courtroom: 4
[Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill]
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff Asusena Avalos ("Plaintiff"), on behalf of herself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Defendant Foster Poultry Farms, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2011, Defendant removed Plaintiff's state court complaint to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d) and 1441;
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2011 Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6), with a hearing date set on May 26, 2011 before this Court;
WHEREAS, on May 9, 2011, Plaintiff, contending this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, filed a Motion to Remand this case back to Fresno County Superior Court;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand was transferred to Magistrate Judge Seng and set for hearing on June 17, 2011, after the hearing date on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to continue the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss from May 26, 2011 to June 30, 2011 to allow a ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand prior to the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss;
WHEREAS, the parties also agree to a new briefing schedule for Plaintiff's memorandum in opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Defendant's reply memorandum in support of its Motion to Dismiss in accordance with the Eastern District of California Local Rule 230 based upon the new hearing date of June 30, 2011; and
WHEREAS, no prior extensions of time have been requested or granted.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY THE PARTIES HERETO, THROUGH THEIR ...