Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Laura Leskinen v. Carolyn A. Halsey

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 13, 2011

LAURA LESKINEN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CAROLYN A. HALSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Through these proposed findings and recommendations, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff's in forma pauperis status be revoked. However, such revocation should be without prejudice.

On March 7, 2011, the undersigned entered an order granting plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing plaintiff's complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Order, Mar. 7, 2011, Dkt. No. 4.) That order granted plaintiff 30 days from the date of that order to file a first amended complaint. (Id. at 11.)

On March 21, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for a 30-day extension of time within which plaintiff would be required to file her first amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 6.) The undersigned granted plaintiff's request. (Order, Mar. 29, 2011, Dkt. No. 8.)

On May 6, 2011, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint and voluntarily paid the $350.00 filing fee associated with opening a case.*fn1 (First Am. Compl., Dkt. No. 9.) As a result of plaintiff's voluntary payment of the filing fee upon filing her First Amended Complaint, it appears that plaintiff was able to pay the filing fee and is no longer entitled to proceed in forma pauperis in this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's in forma pauperis status be revoked without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Id.; see also E. Dist. Local Rule 304(b). Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed with the court and served on all parties within fourteen days after service of the objections. E. Dist. Local Rule 304(d). Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.