Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Michael E. Davis, Aka Tony Davis, Vince v. Electronic Arts Inc

May 17, 2011

MICHAEL E. DAVIS, AKA TONY DAVIS, VINCE FERRAGAMO, AND BILLY JOE
DUPREE, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL
OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg

Date Comp. Filed: July 29, 2010 Trial Date: None

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR 555973.01 DEFENDANT ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ANTI-SLAPP MOTION TO STRIKE

First Amended Complaint; and continuance of the hearing on EA's motion in order to allow Plaintiffs time to propound 6 discovery they believed necessary to oppose EA's anti-SLAPP motion; and extended the period for EA to file a responsive pleading until June 9, 2011 and ordered EA not to 9 set the hearing date for the responsive pleading before July 14, 2011; and 11 conferred regarding Plaintiffs' proposed discovery but have been unable to resolve their 12 differences regarding that discovery; and against EA; and to compel for June 16, 2011; and 18 described below provides appropriate time for the motion to compel to be heard while allowing WHEREAS, the agreed upon briefing schedule will not impact any other dates currently scheduled in this case;

WHEREAS, on January 6, 2011, Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. ("EA") filed a Motion to Dismiss, Or, In the Alternative, Special Motion to Strike Pursuant to C.C.P. § 425.16 Plaintiffs'

WHEREAS, on January 26, 2011, the parties stipulated to and proposed to the court a

WHEREAS, on January 31, 2011, the Court denied without prejudice EA's motions,

WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs' served written discovery on EA and the parties have met and

WHEREAS, on April 28, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel responses to discovery

WHEREAS, on May 4, 2011, Magistrate Judge Ru set the hearing on Plaintiffs' motion

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and believe that the briefing schedule Plaintiffs sufficient time to oppose EA's motion to dismiss and anti-SLAPP motion to strike; and

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and propose as follows:

STIPULATION

1. EA will file its motion to dismiss and anti-SLAPP motion to strike ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.