Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The Committee Concerning Community Improvement, et al v. City of Modesto

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 17, 2011

THE COMMITTEE CONCERNING COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT, ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF MODESTO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jennifer L. Thurston United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER TO PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT SR911 TO SHOW CAUSE TO WHY DISMISSAL SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED AND/OR OTHER SANCTIONS NOT BE IMPOSED

On March 2, 2011, counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendant SR911 reported to the Court that the matter had settled. (Docs. 541, 544 ) On April 1, 2011, counsel reported that the settlement agreement had been developed but, due to logistical difficulties in obtaining the signatures on the document, they needed additional time to file the request for dismissal. (Doc. 547) The Court granted an extension to April 22, 2011 for the stipulated dismissal as to this defendants to be filed. Id. Nevertheless, this stipulated dismissal has not yet been filed.

Therefore, no later than June 3, 2011, the Plaintiffs and Defendant SR911 are ORDERED to show cause why the matter should not be dismissed and/or other sanctions imposed for their failure to comply with the Court's order. Alternatively, if the stipulated dismissal is filed before June 3, 2011, the Court will discharge the order to show cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9j7khi

20110517

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.