The opinion of the court was delivered by: Samuel Conti United States District Judge
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINEALL RELATED CLAIMS PLAINTIFF
Adobe Systems Incorporated ("Adobe" or "Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record, Nicole L. Drey, of J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp., and Defendants Reza Davachi, an individual and d/b/a ProjectContactAfrica; Bahareh Davachi, an individual and d/b/a ProjectContactAfrica; Gayle Barnes, an individual and d/b/a www.directdeals.com; DirectDeals, LLC; and G.W.J. Sourcenet Distribution, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, John L. Krieger, of Lewis and Roca LLP, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS the Complaint was filed in the above-captioned matter on or about August 13, 2010;
WHEREAS the Court held a Case Management Conference on February 18, 2011, at which time the Court ordered the Parties to mediation;
WHEREAS the deadline to complete ADR is currently set for May 19, 2011;
WHEREAS the Parties had originally scheduled mediation for May 10, 2011;
WHEREAS the appointed mediator canceled the mediation session on May 6, 2011, and has withdrawn as the appointed mediator for the case;
WHEREAS a conference call was held between the Parties and the ADR Office on May 17, 2011, at which time the ADR Office noted that it would take another two (2) to three (3) weeks to appoint a new mediator and time thereafter to schedule and arrange for the mediation;
WHEREAS the ADR Office suggested requesting at least a 90-day continuance of the ADR deadline; and WHEREAS no other Court deadlines will be affected by an extension of the ADR deadline.
NOW, THEREFORE, Adobe and Defendants stipulate and request the Court to extend the ADR deadline to August 17, 2011, or a date thereafter acceptable with the Court.
DATED: May 18, 2011 J. Andrew Coombs, A Professional Corp. By: Nicole L. Drey J. Andrew Coombs Nicole L. Drey Attorneys for Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated DATED: May 18, 2011 Lewis and Roca LLP By: John L. Krieger Attorneys for Defendants
[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO REQUEST, IT IS SO ORDERED.
ES DIST T RI A CT S T C O E D U R T T U A