UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 18, 2011
MADELINE KRONENBURG, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, JR United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO NORTHERN DISTRICT; DECLARATION OF DOLORES M. DONOHOE IN SUPPORT THEREOF
Plaintiff DWAINE BAKER and defendant WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT by and through their counsel hereby stipulate to the transfer this case to the Northern District of California pursuant to 28 USD §1406(a) and §1404(a) on the grounds that venue is improper in the Eastern District of California and proper in the Northern District of California. In addition, it is in the interest of justice to transfer said case on the following grounds:
As set forth in the attached Declaration of DOLORES M. DONOHOE, counsel for defendant WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, the DISTRICT is a public entity with its principal place of business in the City of Richmond, Contra Costa County, California, which is located in the Northern District of California.
All of the events and omissions given rise to the subject claim occurred in the Northern District of California and not in the Eastern District of California.
Witnesses are located in the Northern District of California.
Pursuant to 28 USC 1391(b)(1) and (2), venue is proper in the Northern District of California.
DATED: GRAYLING M. WILLIAMS /s/GRAYLING M. WILLIAMS, ESQ. DATED: EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY /s/TIMOTHY P. MURPHY, ESQ.
Good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that this matter is transferred to the Northern District of California.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.