UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
May 19, 2011
IN RE IPHONE APPLICATION LITIG.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
APPLE'S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (re: dkt. #93)
Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") moves to enlarge time to respond to the Consolidated Complaint until June 13, 2011, apparently the response deadline for other newly named 18 Defendants. See Dkt. #93. Currently, under the Court's March 15, 2011 Consolidation Order [dkt. #36], Apple's response is due by May 23, 2011. Apple submits that it would be inefficient and 20 burdensome to submit its response to the Consolidated Complaint two days prior to the May 25, 21 2011 motion hearing regarding Apple's separate motion to stay proceedings pending action by the 22 Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Plaintiffs oppose, arguing that they filed their 23 Consolidated Complaint on an expedited basis, and Apple agreed to file its response on the 24 timeline currently set. 25 Although sympathetic to Plaintiffs' position of having filed the Consolidated Complaint on 26 an expedited basis, the Court discerns no substantial harm or prejudice in allowing Apple to file its 27 response by June 13, 2011, the same response date for other Defendants in this action. See Civ. 28 L.R. 6-3(a). Moreover, the Court would benefit from aligning Apple's time to respond with the 1 other Defendants. For example, if, as anticipated, Defendants file motions to dismiss, Plaintiffs 2 would then have to file oppositions on the same day, instead of filing scattered oppositions on 3 different days. In addition, the Court could schedule a hearing on the motions on the same day and 4 in a single hearing. In sum, allowing Apple a brief extension of time to respond will facilitate 5 effective and efficient case management. 6
Accordingly, Apple's motion to enlarge time to respond to complaint is GRANTED. Apple must file its response to the Consolidated Complaint on or before June 13, 2011. The parties 8 should note that this Order has no bearing on Apple's motion to stay, which will be discussed at the May 25, 2011 motion hearing and case management conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.