Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rodney Lance Harmon v. Dr. Fox

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 19, 2011

RODNEY LANCE HARMON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DR. FOX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and, on May 13, 2011, returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. This action may be dismissed if plaintiff does not file a notice of change of address within sixty-three days of the date his mail was returned. Local Rule 183(b).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff show cause within thirty days from the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to file a notice of change of address; if plaintiff does not respond to this order, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed.

20110519

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.