Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Oracle America, Inc v. Innovative Technology Distributors

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


May 24, 2011

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE SUR-REPLY AND ALLOWING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO RESPONSE TO SUR-REPLY (re: docket #61)

Plaintiff has filed a motion to disqualify counsel, which is set for hearing on July 21, 2011.

See Dkt. #38. The parties have completed briefing on the motion, however, Defendant has moved for leave to file a sur-reply, not to exceed ten pages in length. See Dkt. #61. Plaintiff opposes that motion, and, in the alternative, requests an opportunity to file a response if a sur-reply is allowed.

See Dkt. #64.

Once a reply is filed, no additional briefing may be filed without Court approval. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(d). Here, the Court finds limited supplemental briefing appropriate. Accordingly, Defendant, by May 26, 2011, may file a sur-reply not to exceed 5 pages in length. Plaintiff may file a response to the sur-reply, by June 3, 2011, also not to exceed pages in length.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

20110524

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.