UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
May 24, 2011
IN RE: TFT-LCD FLAT PANEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
This Document Relates to: ORDER RE: BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR DIRECT PURCHASER DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS ACTION CLASS PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTION TO SPECIAL MASTER'S DENIAL OF DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL (DKT. NO. 2756)
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2011, Special Master Quinn issued an Order Denying Motion of Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs to Compel Hitachi to Produce Foreign Regulatory Documents (Dkt. No. 2686);
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2011, Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs filed an Objection to Special Master's Denial of Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (filed under sealat Dkt. No. 2756) ("Objection");
WHEREAS Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. (collectively, the "Hitachi Defendants") and Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs ("Plaintiffs") 10 have reached an agreement to continue the hearing date on Plaintiffs' Objection (previously scheduled for June 17, 2011) until July 12, 2011 at 3:00 p.m.
WHEREAS the Court has confirmed its availability for the hearing on July 12, 2011 at 3:00 p.m;
WHEREAS, this continuation will not alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by the Court;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, the Hitachi Defendants, on the one hand, and Plaintiffs on the other hand, as follows:
1. The Hitachi Defendants' response to Plaintiffs' Objection is due June 21, 2011;
2. Plaintiffs' reply in support of their Objection is due June 28, 2011;
3. The hearing on Plaintiffs' Objection will go forward on July 12, 2011 at 3:00 p.m.;
4. Except as set forth above, all Local Rules shall remain in effect with respect to the briefing on the Objection.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
/s/ Kent M. Roger Kent M. Roger firstname.lastname@example.org Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (415) 442-1000 Fax: (415) 442-1001 Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. /s/ Brendan Glackin Brendan Glackin email@example.com Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 956-1000 Fax: (415) 956-1008 Attorneys for Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs
I, Kent M. Roger, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Brendan Glackin concurs in this filing.
Kent M. Roger Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT Mr. Roger's office is reminded to review the Courts initial order with respect to filing documents in this and any related individual case. Also, the Court granted leave to file a motion Re: Objections to Special Master's Denial of a motion to compel. The motion was filed under seal. There has been no public version filed and this motion was not docketed for a hearing date.
Counsel must notice their motions on the docket otherwise, the hearing will not appear on the calendar.
The motion that was not on our calendar for June 17, 2011, has been continued to July 12, 2011, however you must actually set that for hearing when the redacted version is filed with the Court.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.