IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 24, 2011
MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM, PETITIONER,
M. VEAL, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
In response the court's order, filed on March 18, 2011, directing petitioner and respondent to file a joint status report detailing the claims remaining to be decided after remand, the parties filed a joint status report on April 8, 2011, stating that since petitioner/appellee still has motions pending before the Ninth Circuit which have yet to be ruled on and no mandate has yet issued, this court lacks jurisdiction. Accordingly, the undersigned will not require a joint status report regarding claims that remain to be decided and the process necessary to decide them until such time as a mandate from the Ninth Circuit may issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.