STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Whereas, Defendants' response to the complaint is currently due June 8,2011; 4102.
Whereas, this case is related to the following cases pending in the Eastern District of California: Assavarungnirun v. Health Net, Inc., Case No. 11-cv-1008- KJM-DAD; Avila v. Health Net, Inc., Case No. 11-cv-1097-JAM-KJN; Whitaker v. Health Net of California, Inc., Case No. 11-cv-910-KJM-DAD; Bournas v. Health
Net, Inc., Case No. 11-cv-1262-GEB-DAD; Kirk v. Health Net, Inc., Case No. 11-6 cv-1376-MCE-DAD; and Johnston v. Health Net, Inc. of California, Case No. 11-7 cv-1377-GEB-DAD;
Whereas, this case is also related to two cases pending in the Northern District of California, which will likely be transferred to this District;
Whereas, the parties are discussing coordination of these actions, and an extension to respond to the complaint would promote the orderly administration of 12 the Court's docket and prevent waste of the parties' resources; Whereas, the parties had previously extended the deadline to respond by a total of 30 days while this case was pending in the Central District of California. Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate that Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to July 11, 2011.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
By /s/ Karin Kramer*fn1 Karin Kramer Attorneys for Defendant International Business Machines Corporation
DATED: May 24, 2011 RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO & KOPCZYNSKI LLP By /s/ Jeffrey B. Cereghino Jeffrey B. Cereghino Attorneys for Plaintiff Cecil Orenzo Bowman DATED: May 24, 2011 CROWELL & MORING LLP 9 10 11 By /s/ Ethan P. Schulman Ethan P. Schulman Attorneys for Defendants Health Net, Inc. and Health Net of California, Inc.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ...