Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pacifica Loan Pool, LLC v. Gustavo Campos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 27, 2011

PACIFICA LOAN POOL, LLC
v.
GUSTAVO CAMPOS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Present: The Honorable Andrew J. Guilford

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Title

Lisa Bredahl Not Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER REMANDING CASE

Plaintiff filed this case in state court for unlawful detainer. Defendant then filed a Notice of Removal, which removed this case from state to federal court. For the reasons that follow, the Court REMANDS the case to state court.

Plaintiff's Complaint states a simple state cause of action for unlawful detainer. Defendants' Notice of Removal argues that federal jurisdiction is proper. But a review the Complaint makes clear that Defendant's argument fails. The Complaint does not rely on any federal law, so Defendants have not demonstrated a basis for federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); Syngenta Crop Prot., Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 33 (2002) ("Under the plain terms of § 1441(a), in order properly to remove [an] action pursuant to that provision, [defendants] must demonstrate that original subject-matter jurisdiction lies in the federal courts.").

Further, in unlawful detainer actions, "[s]peedy adjudication is desirable to prevent subjecting the landlord to undeserved economic loss and the tenant to unmerited harassment and dispossession when his lease or rental agreement gives him the right to

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. SACV 11-810 AG (SSx)

Date May 27, 2011

Title

PACIFICA LOAN POOL, LLC V. GUSTAVO CAMPOS

peaceful and undisturbed possession of the property." Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 73 (1972). Improper removal of unlawful detainer cases harms the concerns stated in Lindsey. Defendants are cautioned not to improperly seek federal jurisdiction, particularly for delay.

In sum, Defendant fails to establish that federal jurisdiction exists over this case. Thus, the case is REMANDED to Orange County Superior Court.

Initials of Preparer lmb

20110527

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.