Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Michael J. Brodheim v. M. Veal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 27, 2011

MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM, PETITIONER,
v.
M. VEAL, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

The mandate from the Ninth Circuit having issued on May 24, 2011, petitioner and respondent are now ORDERED to file a joint status report within twenty-one days detailing what claims remain to be decided after remand, and what process is necessary to decide them. If the parties cannot agree, the respective disagreements shall be set forth separately in the joint statement. If a party, or the parties, believe that this case can proceed on the same issues present in the Gilman class action referenced in the undersigned's findings and recommendations, the belief that this habeas case can proceed with the same issues being adjudicated in the Gilman case shall be supported by legal authority.

20110527

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.