Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Atpac, Inc v. Aptitude Solutions

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 31, 2011

ATPAC, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
APTITUDE SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff has submitted an ex parte application for an order shortening time for hearing on a motion for terminating sanctions due to defendants' alleged failure to comply with discovery orders. Under the revised scheduling order filed October 28, 2010, the discovery cutoff is September 15, 2011. Plaintiff fails to demonstrate why a motion for terminating sanctions must be heard on shortened time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's ex parte application (docket no. 166) is denied.

2. For purposes of the motion referenced in plaintiff's ex parte application, the parties are relieved of the letter briefing requirement set forth in the court's November 18, 2010 order. (Docket no. 56.) Said motion may be noticed on the undersigned's regular law and motion calendar. The joint statement filed under Local Rule 251 shall be limited to twenty pages, with printing in twelve-point type. This page limit does not include exhibits. The joint statement shall be filed no later than fourteen days prior to the date noticed for hearing on the motion and a courtesy copy of the joint statement and accompanying exhibits shall be submitted to the TEMP chambers.

JMM atpac.ost

20110531

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.