UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 31, 2011
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, A MUNICIPALITY, DEFENDANT.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER
Civil Local Rule 144
WHEREAS, the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (CSPA) filed its complaint in the above-captioned case on March 3, 2011;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the summons and complaint on Defendant on May 26, 2011;
WHEREAS, Defendant acknowledged receipt of the summons and complaint on May 27, 2011;
WHEREAS, the standard time for the City of Sacramento to respond to the Plaintiff's complaint is twenty-one (21) days from May 27, 2011;
WHEREAS, the parties have exchanged written proposals for settlement and are in the process of negotiating specific terms, and the parties believe that settlement is likely. Therefore, the parties agree that an extension for Defendant to respond to the complaint will save resources.
WHEREAS, there have been no previous extensions of time in this case.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between CPSA and the City, through their respective counsel of record, that the City shall have an extension of sixty (60) days to and including July 26, 2011, within which to respond to CSPA's complaint. The Parties enter this stipulation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 144.
LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC. Dated: May 27, 2011 By: /s/ Drevet Hunt Drevet Hunt, Attorney for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE SOMACH SIMMONS & DUNN A Professional Corporation Dated: May 27, 2011 By: /s/ Roberta L. Larson (as authorized on May 27, 2011) Roberta L. Larson, Attorney for Defendant CITY OF SACRAMENTO
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, the City shall file its response to Plaintiff's complaint on or before July 26, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.