Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kathlyn A. Rhodes v. Placer County

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 1, 2011

KATHLYN A. RHODES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PLACER COUNTY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

This matter came on for a status (pretrial scheduling) conference on May 19, 2011. Plaintiff Kathlyn Rhodes ("plaintiff") is a licensed attorney bringing this action on her own behalf.*fn1 Plaintiff attended the status conference, but did not participate in the creation of defendants' status report and did not file a written status report until one day before the conference. Plaintiff had approximately five weeks' notice of the status conference. (Dkt. No. 123 (Order entered April 5, 2011, setting matter for status conference on May 19, 2011).)

During the status conference, plaintiff informed the court that extenuating circumstances prevented her from participating in the creation of a joint status report and also prevented her from filing her individual status report prior to one day before the conference. The undersigned ordered plaintiff to file a written statement under penalty of perjury detailing the circumstances preventing her from filing a status report earlier than one day before the conference, and showing cause why she should not be sanctioned. (Dkt. No. 134.) The undersigned also ordered plaintiff to show cause why the court should accept her delayed status report. (Id.)

On May 26, 2011, plaintiff timely filed a written statement in substantial compliance with the court's order to show cause, which sufficiently described the events contributing to her delayed filing: a medical emergency combined with plaintiff's decision to use a shared post office box to receive her mail. (Dkt. No. 146.) While plaintiff's written statement did not expressly include the words "under penalty of perjury" as the court had directed, the court accepts plaintiff's representations as truthful and in accordance with plaintiff's ethical duties and duty of candor as an attorney and officer of the court.

The undersigned also reminds plaintiff of her obligation to timely prosecute her case. This may require plaintiff to increase the frequency of her visits to the post office box she describes so as to timely receive notifications regarding this case, or perhaps to change her address of record altogether.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Order to Show Cause (Dkt. No. 134) is discharged. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.