The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge
(1) CONFIRMING CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS; (2) GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; (3) APPROVING CLASS REPRESENTATIVES INCENTIVE PAYMENTS; (4) APPROVING CLASS COUNSEL FEES AND COSTS; (5) APPROVING SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR FEES; (6) APPROVING PAYMENT OF PAGA PENALITES (7) ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT
On May 16, 2011 a hearing was held on the motion by Plaintiffs and class representatives ctavio Alvarado, Pablo Martinez, Omar Gomez, Daniel Gomez, and Jose De Jesus Garcia "Plaintiffs"), for Final Certification of a settlement class in this action, Final Approval of the parties' roposed settlement, approval of Class Representative incentive payments, approval of attorney's fees costs, approving settlement administrator's fees, and ordering judgment in the case. Stan S. allison appeared from Mallison & Martinez on behalf of Plaintiffs. Defendants did not appear. No bjectors appeared at the time of the hearing.
The Court having read and considered the papers on the motion, the arguments of counsel, and he law, and good cause appearing therefore, T IS ORDERED:
1. The Court has jurisdiction over this action and the parties' proposed settlement under 28 .S.C. sections 1331 and 1367, as plaintiffs' original complaint was brought under the Agricultural orkers Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq.; and related California wage-and-hour law; the Court s original jurisdiction over plaintiffs' federal law claims; and the Court has supplemental jurisdiction er plaintiffs' state-law claims because they arise from the same alleged transactions and occurrences as plaintiffs' federal-law claims.
2. For the reasons stated in the Order Granting Preliminary Approval, the Court finds that e action meets all the requirements for class certification, and it is hereby ordered that the Settlement ass is finally approved and certified as a class for purposes of settlement of this action.
3. The parties' Settlement Agreement (the "Settlement") (attached as Ex. 1 to Declaration of an S. Mallison in Support of Joint Motion for Final Approval of Settlement is granted as it meets the iteria for final settlement approval. The Settlement falls within the range of possible approval as fair, equate and reasonable, and appears to be the product of arm's-length and informed negotiations and to eat all Class Members fairly.
4. The parties' Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action,
Conditional Certification of ttlement Class, Preliminary Approval of
Settlement, Hearing Date for Final Court Approval ("Class notice"), and
proposed forms of Claim Form and Election Not to Participate in
Settlement (collectively e "Class Notice Packet") were sufficient to
inform Class Members of the terms of the Settlement; their
htsunder the Settlement; their rights to object to the settlement; their
right to receive a Settlement are or elect not to participate in the
Settlement; the processes for receiving a Settlement Share, electing t
to participate in the Settlement or Objecting to the Settlement; and
the date and location of the final pproval hearing. Therefore, the
Court finds and determines that the parties' notice procedures were
mpleted and were constitutionally sound, because individual notices
were mailed to all class members hose identities are known to the
parties, and such notice was the best notice practicable.
5. The following class of persons are certified as the Class in this action solely for the rposes of the Settlement: 138 current and former Dairy employees who worked between July 30, 2004 September 7, 2010.
6. All Class Members who submitted a timely and valid Claim Form within thirty days after e date the Settlement Administrator mailed the Class Notice Packet will receive a Settlement Share.
7. Class Members were provided with the opportunity to comment on, or object to, the ttlement, as well as to elect not to participate in the Settlement. No Class Members filed written jections to the Settlement as part of the parties' notice procedures nor stated intent to appear at the final pproval hearing.
8. Simpluris Inc. is awarded $15,000 for their services as Settlement Administrator, pursuant the terms set forth in the Settlement.
9. Class Representatives Octavio Alvarado, Pablo Martinez, Omar Gomez, Daniel Gomez, d Jose De Jesus Garcia are awarded $7,500 as incentive payments pursuant to the terms set forth in the ttlement.
10. Class Counsel, Mallison & Martinez, are awarded $165,523 of the gross recovery in orneys fees and $10,000 in costs for their work and costs incurred in prosecuting this case.
11. The California Labor Code Private Attorney General Act payment of $10,000 to the State ...