Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Carlos Urbano v. Michael J. Astrue

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 3, 2011

CARLOS URBANO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, DEFENDANT.

ORDER

The above-captioned action is proceeding before the undersigned pursuant to the consent of the parties. E.D. Cal. L.R. 305; Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. On May 2, 2011, the undersigned issued an order requiring plaintiff to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failure to timely file a motion for summary judgment and/or remand, and directing plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment and/or remand on or before May 23, 2011. Dckt. No. 18.

On May 23, 2011, plaintiff's counsel filed a response to the order to show cause, acknowledging her failure and apologizing for her oversight. Dckt. No. 19. Also on May 23, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. Dckt. No. 20.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the May 2, 2011 order to show cause, Dckt. No. 18, is discharged and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, Dckt. No. 20, is deemed timely filed.

SO ORDERED.

20110603

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.