Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Douglas C. Boyack, et al v. Eric Richard Eleson

June 3, 2011

DOUGLAS C. BOYACK, ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ERIC RICHARD ELESON,
DEFENDANT.



ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR REMAND BE GRANTED (Docs. 5, 10)

On April 22, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiffs' motion to remand be granted. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties appearing in the action and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within seventeen (17) days after service of the order. On May 5, 2011, Defendant Eleson filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The April 22, 2011, Findings and Recommendations are adopted IN FULL;

2. Plaintiffs' request for judicial notice is GRANTED;

3. Plaintiffs' motion to remand this matter to the Tuolumne County Superior Court is GRANTED;

4. Defendant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED AS MOOT; and

5. This action is to be administratively closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

0m8i78

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20110603

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.