Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Raymond Usher, et al v. Chase Home Finance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 6, 2011

RAYMOND USHER, ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend First Amended Complaint ("Motion"), which was filed on January 6, 2011, well after the Court's December 13, 2010, entry of judgment in this action. "The Court may consider a rule 15(a) motion for leave to amend which follows an order or judgment of dismissal only if the Court first alters, vacates, or sets aside the order or judgment under either rule 59 or rule 60(b)." Roque v. City of Redlands, 79 F.R.D. 433 (C.D. Cal. 1978) (internal citations omitted).

The Court has not altered, vacated or set aside the judgment. Moreover, the Court specifically denied Plaintiffs' December 15, 2010 request for an extension of time to file an amended pleading. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' current Motion (ECF No. 19) is DENIED. The Court will not entertain any further Motions for Leave to Amend Plaintiffs' Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110606

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.