Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. James T. Allen

June 9, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JAMES T. ALLEN



The opinion of the court was delivered by: George H. Wu, U. S. District Judge

Social Security No. 7 3 0 6

(Last 4 digits)

JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER

MONTH DAY YEAR

In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 06 06 2011

Jan L. Handzlik, Retained

(Name of Counsel)

U GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.

NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY

There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:

18 U.S.C. § 1546(a), 2 NON-IMMIGRANT VISA FRAUD; AIDING AND ABETTING and 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B)(1),2 TRANSPORTATION MONEY LAUNDERING; AIDING AND ABETTING, as charged in the Information.

The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of: Five (5) Months.

It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $200, which is due immediately to the Clerk

Defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $300,000 to victims as set forth in a separate victim list prepared by the probation office which this Court adopts and which reflects the Court's determination of the amount of restitution due to each victim. The victim list, which shall be forwarded to the fiscal section of the clerk's office, shall remain confidential to protect the privacy interests of the victims.

Pursuant to Guideline Section 5E1.2(a), all fines are waived as the Court finds that the defendant has established that he is unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay any fine.

Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, James T. Allen, is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 5 months. This term consists of 5 months on each of Counts 1 and 2 of the Information, with all such terms to be served concurrently.

Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of 3 years under the following

The defendant shall participate for a period of 6 months in a home detention program which may include electronic monitoring, GPS, Alcohol Monitoring Unit or automated identification systems and shall observe all rules of such program, as directed by the Probation Officer. The defendant shall maintain a residential telephone line without devices and/or services that may interrupt operation of the monitoring equipment. Defendant may attend three little league baseball game functions for his son a week;

The defendant shall pay the costs of home confinement monitoring to the contract vendor, not to exceed the sum of $12.00 for each day of participation. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payment as directed by the Probation Officer.

As directed by the Probation Officer, the defendant shall provide all federal and state income tax returns related to defendant's profession;

During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay restitution in the amount of $300 per month beginning 60days from release;

The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;

During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;

The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.

The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.