Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Anthony Jerome Hairston v. K. Harrington

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 9, 2011

ANTHONY JEROME HAIRSTON, PETITIONER,
v.
K. HARRINGTON, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner's May 27, 2011 motion for law library access, and his June 6, 2011 motion for an extension of time to file a reply to respondent's answer.

Petitioner alleges that he has been unable to go to the law library for the past few months. However, petitioner does not discuss why he has been unable to obtain law library access. For this reason, petitioner's motion for law library access is denied without prejudice. If petitioner is unable to obtain law library access to prepare his reply, he may renew his motion. A renewed motion for law library access must detail petitioner's attempts to obtain law library access.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's motion for law library access (Dkt. No. 21) is denied without prejudice;

2. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 22) is granted; petitioner's reply to respondent's answer is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

hai3056.eot

20110609

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.