UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 10, 2011
MATTHEW P. TONSING,
PETITIONER AND PLAINTIFF,
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE COMMISSION, AND SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, RESPONDENTS AND DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Richard Seeborg Judge of the District Court
DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney 2 ELIZABETH SALVESON, State Bar #83788 Chief Labor Attorney 3 LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH, State Bar #129688 Deputy City Attorney 4 Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor 5 San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3933 6 Facsimile: (415) 554-4248 E-Mail: email@example.com 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 9 SAN FRANCISCO POLICE COMMISSION, and SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT DANIEL M. CRAWFORD 354 Pine Street, Third Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 12 Telephone: (415) 433-1442 Facsimile: (415) 986-4056 13 E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Plaintiff / Petitioner MATTHEW P. TONSING
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-3(d) RE FILING SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
WHEREAS, defendants' Motion To Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(c) was
and taken under the Court on June 2, 2011 and;
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2011 the California Court of Appeal filed a decision entitled Joy Hall- Villareal v. City of Fresno et. al., a copy of which is attached hereto, that is relevant to the matter 5 under submission; 6
THEREFORE the parties stipulate that the Joy Hall-Villareal v. City of
Fresno et. al. be filed
with the court for its consideration.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
Dated: June 3, 2011 Respectfully submitted,
IT IS SO ORDERED
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.