Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Belinda K v. County of Alameda et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


June 10, 2011

BELINDA K.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

Reply (Docket Number 133). The attachments contain information relating to the underlying child dependency proceedings in Alameda County Superior Court. These documents contain sensitive information relating to the minor J.H. This information is properly sealable, and Plaintiff's request to seal redactions from and attachments to Docket Number 133 is GRANTED.

Plaintiff has filed Administrative Motions to Seal, Docket Numbers 134 and 145. Docket Number 134 seeks to seal unredacted versions of several documents attached to Plaintiff's Sur-18 Docket Number 145 seeks to seal Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Declaration filed in support of her

Motion to Strike the East Bay Children's Law Office and Jonna Thomas's Motion to Dismiss, and the unredacted version of her Motion to Strike. Because Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Declaration contains a sealed transcript of the proceedings of the underlying juvenile dependency proceedings, it is properly sealable. Because the redacted portions of Plaintiff's Motion contain information previously designated sealable, this information is properly sealable as well. Thus, Plaintiff's request is GRANTED and sealing of Docket Numbers 143 and 144 is approved.

Plaintiff is reminded that Administrative Motions to Seal, Proposed Orders, and other supporting documents (other than the documents Plaintiff seeks to seal) should not themselves be 3 filed under seal. Therefore, the Court does not approve sealing of Docket Number 145. In addition, parties should not publicly file the redacted versions of sealed documents until sealing has 5 been approved by the Court. See Civ. L.R. 79-5(c)(5).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

United States District Court For the Northern District of California

20110610

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.