The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. David T. Bristow United States Magistrate Judge
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Judge: Hon. Davit T. Bristow, Courtroom: 4, 3rd FloorThe Court, having considered the Stipulation for Protective Order re Confidential Discovery Material ("Stipulation") submitted by Defendant Starbucks Corporation ("Defendant") and plaintiff Tanya Danko ("Plaintiff"), and finding good cause shown, hereby orders as follows:
The terms set forth in the Stipulation shall be implemented.
PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is: 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400, Los Angeles, California 90067. On June 10, 2011, I served the foregoing document(s) described as:
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIL INFORMATION on the interested party(ies) below, using the following means:
All parties identified for Notice of Electronic Filing generated by the Court's CM/ECF system under the referenced case caption and number BY ELECTRONIC MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the document(s) to be sent to the respective e-mail address(es) of the party(ies) as stated above. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful.
(FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made.
Executed on June 10, 2011 at Los Angeles, California.
Lorachristine Ramsey [Print Name of Person Executing Proof] [Signature]
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...