Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ej Thompson, Valery Thompson Midstate Properties v. City of Redding

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 10, 2011

EJ THOMPSON, VALERY THOMPSON MIDSTATE PROPERTIES,
VIOLET MANOR AND CEDARS ROAD, LLC, PLAINTIFFS
v.
CITY OF REDDING, DEBORAH WRIGHT, WILLIAM NAGEL, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, DEFENDANTS.

MICHAEL A. SCHEIBLI, SBN 196748 Attorney at Law 1416 West Street Redding, CA 96001 Phone (530) 243-0317 Facsimile (530) 243-2003 mscheibli@snowcrest.net Attorney for Plaintiffs E.J. THOMPSON, VALERY THOMPSON, MIDSTATE PROPERTIES, VIOLET MANNER and CEDARS ROAD, LLC PETER D. HALLORAN SBN 184025 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF 601 University Avenue, Ste. 150 Sacramento, CA 95825 Phone: (916) 564-6100 Fax: (916) 564-6263 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF REDDING, DEBORAH WRIGHT, and WILLIAM NAGLE

STIPULATION FOR AN ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE AND ORDER THEREON

On November 16, 2009, this court issued a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order. On or about November 23, 2010 this Court issued a new pretrial scheduling order due to unforseen circumstances including the retirement of Lawrence L. Angelo. On February 2, 2011, the Court entered a new scheduling order modifying the expert disclosure deadlines. Since that time Andrea Miller, attorney of record for the Plaintiffs became ill and was and is unable to continue as attorney for the Plaintiffs.

A new attorney, Michael A. Scheibli has substituted in and is in the process of reviewing the case, documents, discovery, issues and getting up to speed on this complex case. At present there are over 2000 pages of discovery and documents to review.

As a result of these unforseen circumstances and the need for Michael A. Scheibli's need to familiarize himself with the case, issues, and discovery the rescheduling of this case is necessary.

JOINT SCHEDULING ORDER

ACTIVITY CURRENT DATE REQUESTED DATE Plaintiffs' Disclosure of Experts 5/16/11 10/16/11 Defendants' Disclosure of Experts 5/30/11 10/30/11 Discovery Completion Date 6/27/11 11/30/11 Last Motion Hearing Date 7/25/11 01/31/12 Final Pretrial Conf. 9/19/11 at 2:00 pm Mid to late April 2012 Jury Trial 11/15/11 at 9:00 am Mid to late May 2012

All other descriptive elements of the original Scheduling Order shall be enforced as is set forth in this new Scheduling Plan without the need for restating it.

ORDER

Wherefore, it is hereby ordered that pursuant to the above Stipulation the dates are rescheduled as follows:

ACTIVITY NEW DATES

Plaintiffs' Disclosure of Experts 10/17/11 Defendants' Disclosure of Experts 10/31/11 Discovery Completion Date 11/30/11 Last Motion Hearing Date 01/30/12 at 2:00 p.m. Final Pretrial Conf. 4/16/2012 at 2:00 p.m. Jury Trial May 30, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.

It is further ordered that all other descriptive elements of the original Scheduling Order shall be enforced as is set forth in this new Scheduling Plan without the need for restating it.

20110610

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.