UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 13, 2011
NOMADIX, INC., PLAINTIFF,
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; WAYPORT, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; IBAHN CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LTD., A CANADIAN CORPORATION; GUEST-TEK INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; LODGENET INTERACTIVE CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; LODGENET STAYONLINE, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.; A DELAWARE CORPORATION; SUPERCLICK, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION; SUPERCLICK NETWORKS, INC., A CANADIAN CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dean D. Pregerson United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE'S ORDER & DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE'S ORDER [Motions filed on May 6, 2011 and May 9, 2011]
Presently before the court is Nomadix's Motion for Review of the Magistrate's Order and Wayport, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, iBAHN Corporation, Aruba Networks, Inc., and Solution Technologies Ltd. (collectively "Defendants") Motion for Review of Magistrate Order.
The Magistrate Judge's April 22, 2011, Order Re: Defendants' Motion to Compel Settlement-Related Discovery (Dkt. No. 315) is not clearly erroneous. The court adopts the order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.