Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

North Sacramento Land Company; Levee District 1 v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service; Ken Salazar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 13, 2011

NORTH SACRAMENTO LAND COMPANY; LEVEE DISTRICT 1; RECLAMATION DISTRICT 784; SACRAMENTO VALLEY LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION; BUTTE COUNTY FARM BUREAU; SOLANO COUNTY FARM BUREAU; AND YOLO COUNTY FARM BUREAU, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; KEN SALAZAR, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF INTERIOR; ROWAN W. GOULD, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING DIRECTOR OF UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; AND REN LOHOEFENER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGION OF THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge

ORDER ON JOINT STATUS REPORT ORDER

Based on the agreed report filed by the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED that the schedule for this case is as follows:

August 12, 2011: Administrative Record Filed

September 9, 2011: Any Motions to Supplement Administrative Record

September 30, 2011: Oppositions to Motions to Supplement Administrative Record

October 14, 2011: Replies for Motions to Supplement Administrative Record

If no motions to supplement the administrative record are filed, the Parties will file their summary judgment briefing as follows:

October 31, 2011: Plaintiffs file their motion for summary judgment.

November 18, 2011: The Service files its combined cross motion for summary judgment and opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.

December 2, 2011: Plaintiffs file their combined opposition to the Service's cross motion and reply.

December 16, 2011: The Service files its reply to Plaintiffs' opposition.

If there are motions to supplement the record, the Parties will file a proposed briefing schedule within 10 days after the Court acts on those motions. The Parties are excused from the requirements of Local Rule 260(a)-(c) regarding statements of facts to accompany motions for summary judgment.

20110613

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.