Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Investor's Business Daily, Inc., A California Corporation v. Kim Lee Tong A/K/A Kim T. Tong A/K/A Kim T. Lee

June 14, 2011

INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
KIM LEE TONG A/K/A KIM T. TONG A/K/A KIM T. LEE, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND DAN HOANG TRAN A/K/A DAN TRAN AN INDIVIDUAL, COLLECTIVELY D/B/A STOCK MARKET DVDS, WALLSTREET ZONE, WWW.WALLSTREET-DVDS.COM, WWW.WALLSTRET-DVDS.COM, WWW.WALLSTREET-ZONE.COM, WWW.STOCKMARKET-DVDS.COM, WWW.LYNH.COM, HTTP://STORE.UPDOWNSIDEWAY.COM; GG PRINTING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION D/B/A GOLDEN GRAPHIX & PRINTING, AND DOES 2-10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS. DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable A. Howard Matz United States District Judge

REVISED ORDER RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: Defendants KIM LEE TONG a/k/a KIM T. TONG a/k/a KIM T. LEE, Stock Market DVDs, WallStreet Zone, www.WallStreet-DVDs.com, www.WallStretDVDs.com, www.wallstreet-zone.com, www.stockmarket-dvds.com, www.lynh.com, http://store.updownsideway.com, GOLDEN GRAPHIX & PRINTING, and their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and those in active concert or participation with them are preliminarily enjoined from:

1. imitating, copying, counterfeiting, or making unauthorized use of Investor's Business Daily's ("IBD") Copyrights and Trademarks;

2. manufacturing, producing, distributing, selling, offering for sale, moving, or otherwise disposing of, any product bearing any simulation, reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of IBD's Copyrights and Trademarks;

3. using any simulation, reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of IBD's Copyrights and Trademarks;

4. using any false designation of origin or false description that can, or is likely to, lead the public or individual members thereof to believe that any product manufactured, distributed, or sold by Defendants is in any manner associated with or connected with IBD, or is sold, manufactured, licensed, sponsored, or approved or authorized by IBD;

5. engaging in any other activity constituting an infringement of IBD's copyright or trademark rights or otherwise unfairly competing with IBD;

6. destroying, modifying, disposing of, concealing, or moving the following:

a. products incorporating IBD's Copyrights or Trademarks;

b. any other products which picture, reproduce, copy or use the likeness of or bear a substantial similarity to any of IBD's Copyrights or Trademarks;

c. any labels, packages, wrappers, containers or any other unauthorized promotion or advertising material item which reproduces, copies, counterfeits, imitates or bears any of IBD's Copyrights or Trademarks;

d. any devices or elements used for making or manufacturing products incorporating IBD's Copyrights or Trademarks; and

e. any sales and supply of customer journals, ledgers, invoices, purchase orders, inventory control documents, bank records, catalogs and all other business records, believed to concern the manufacture, purchase, advertising, sale or offering for ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.