Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Harold Walker v. City of Fresno

June 14, 2011

HAROLD WALKER,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF FRESNO, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENT THE MOTION TO COMPEL

On February 28, 2011, Defendants propounded discovery on Plaintiff requesting responses to Interrogatories, Admissions, and Production of Documents. (Doc. 46-1, 2-3.) Plaintiff provided responses to Defendants' Interrogatories, but not to Defendants' requests for Admissions or the request for Production of Documents. (Doc. 46-1, 3; Doc. 46-2, 2.) Defendants have moved to compel a response to the requests for Admissions and for Production of Documents, but Defendants have failed to attach to their motion the proof of service of the discovery requests or a copy of the discovery requests to which they seek to compel a response.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants shall have two (2) days from the date of this order to supplement their motion by filing a copy of the discovery requests and the applicable proofs of service.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ie14hj

20110614

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.