UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 16, 2011
GAIL FITZPATRICK AND WAYNE WALKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
MATCH.COM, L.L.C. DEFENDANT(S).
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
___ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ___ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
x Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 1608 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
___ Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
____ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
x other requested deadline - within a reasonable time after the Resolution of the pending Motion to Dismiss, and the forthcoming 12(b)(6) Motion, and Motion to Deny Class Certification.
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: ___ Non-binding Arbitration ___ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
x Mediation ___ Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session ___ 90 days from the date of this order.
r the Resolution of the pending Motion to Dismiss, and the forthcoming 12(b)(6) Motion, and Motion to Deny Class Certification.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
x other - within a reasonable time afte
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.