Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Daniel H. Govind v. Veal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 17, 2011

DANIEL H. GOVIND,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
VEAL, ET AL DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Otis D. Wright, II, District Judge

ORDER

On April 20, 2011 Plaintiff filed his "Motion to Object and Opposition to Defendant's (sic) Attorney / Williams and Associates to Dismiss Plaintiff Civil Right Claim under sect § 1983 Should Be Denied." [61] In it, he "moves [the] copurt to Discharge the following defendants from this civil proceeding: Defendants Oberst, Fiegener, [Fiegner], Flaherty, Nuchols, [Nichols], Gamgury,[Gamburg], Runnels, Lamberton, Garrison, Harrison, Gorden, Holmes, Gower, Wagner, Koped's, [Kopec], Jackson, Martinez, Coles, Bates, Hale, Micone, McDonald, Spangle, and Tasi and Ms. Armetta [Armitta]."

On the same day, Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition. [59] The names in bold do not appear on the docket as defendants. In any event, the court hereby GRANTS plaintiff's motion of dismissal and the above mentioned defendants are hereby DISMISSED from this action. With respect to the defendants who do not appear on the docket, they too are dismissed on motion of the plaintiff.

20110617

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.