Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William Carter Iii v. Central Mortgage Company et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 20, 2011

WILLIAM CARTER III
v.
CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY ET AL

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Gary Allen Feess

LINKS: 8, 9

JS-6

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable GARY ALLEN FEESS

Renee Fisher None N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None None

Proceedings: (In Chambers)

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Plaintiff William Carter III filed this suit pro se against Defendants Central Mortgage Company ("Central"), First National Bank of Arizona, and Amstar Mortgage (collectively, "Defendants") on February 23, 2011, and Central subsequently removed the case to this Court on May 23, 2011. (Docket No. 1, Not., Ex. A [Compl.].) On June 14, 2011, this Court ordered Central to show cause why the removal was "not procedurally defective for (1) untimeliness and (2) failure to comply with the unanimity requirement." (Docket No. 8.) Central has now responded to the order to show cause ("OSC"). (Docket No. 9.) In its response, Central agrees that its "removal was not timely made," and states "that remand of the action will be appropriate." (Id.)

Accordingly, having conceded that the removal was procedurally defective, the Court REMANDS the present action back to the Los Angeles County Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110620

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.