Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brent Winters, et al v. Delores Jordan

June 20, 2011

BRENT WINTERS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
DELORES JORDAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Presently before the court is plaintiffs' "Motion to Join Defendants Benjamin Wagner and J. Earlene Gordon" to this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2). (Dkt. No. 232.) Because oral argument would not materially aid the resolution of the pending motion, the undersigned submitted this matter on the briefs and record without a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); E. Dist. Local Rule 230(g). Having fully considered plaintiffs' moving and reply papers and defendants' written opposition, the undersigned denies plaintiffs' motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint alleges no facts about Benjamin B. Wagner, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, or J. Earlene Gordon, an Assistant United States Attorney who works under Wagner and is or was counsel for several other defendants in this case. Based on the record before the court, Wagner's and Gordon's only connection with this action is their representation of other named defendants.

Plaintiffs sued several defendants in this action based on their participation in the criminal investigation and prosecution of plaintiff Brent Winters in a matter that proceeded in the Central District of Illinois. See generally United States v. Hills, 618 F.3d 619 (7th Cir. 2010). The following defendants named in this action were federal prosecutors or internal revenue agents involved in the criminal investigation and prosecution of Brent Winters: Jan Paul Miller, Bernard Coleman, Sue Roderick, Kathi Jo McBride, Stephen Tinsley, Kevin Martens, Phillip Johnson, Hilda Molnar, Robert Anderson, Donald Staggs, James Pogue, Patrick Chelsey, and Hilary Frooman (collectively, "Federal Defendants"). Defendant John Taylor is an Assistant Federal Public Defender who represented one of Brent Winters's co-defendants in the criminal action in Illinois. The Illinois investigation began as early as 1999, and the trial concluded in June 2008. See Hills, 618 F.3d at 624-25.

On August 11, 2010, the Federal Defendants and Taylor filed, through Assistant United States Attorney Gordon, an ex parte motion for a 60-day extension of time to respond to the Third Amended Complaint on the grounds these defendants, all of whom are former or current federal employees, were then seeking representation by the United States Attorney's Office. (Dkt. No. 151.) The court granted the extension and ordered that responses to the Third Amended Complaint be filed on or before October 15, 2010. (Order, Aug. 12, 2010, Dkt. No. 152.) On October 14, 2010, defendant John Taylor requested, again through Gordon, another extension, until November 15, 2010, to file a response to the Third Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 184.) Taylor did so on the ground that the United States Attorney's Office had declined his request for representation, and Taylor would thus have to find private counsel. The court granted Taylor's request for an additional extension. (Order, Oct. 15, 2010, Dkt. No. 190.)

On October 15, 2010, the Federal Defendants filed a timely motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims against them on several grounds. On November 4, 2010, John Taylor filed a timely motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims against him on several grounds, but through private counsel.*fn1

On February 7, 2011, plaintiffs filed the pending motion to join Wagner and Gordon as defendants in this action. Plaintiffs contend that Wagner and Gordon violated federal statutes, including the Westfall Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(1), by representing the Federal Defendants and Taylor at all.

II. DISCUSSION

In relevant part, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2) provides:

(a) Persons Who May Join or Be Joined.

(2) Defendants. Persons . . . may be joined in one action as defendants if:

(A) any right to relief is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.