UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
June 22, 2011
IN RE: TFT-LCD ANTITRUST LITIGATION
ELECTROGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC.;
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Y. Illston United States District Judge
William A. Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20015 Telephone: (202) 237-2727 Facsimile: (202) 237-6131 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Philip J. Iovieno (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor Albany, NY 12207 Telephone: (518) 434-0600 Facsimile: (518) 434-0665 Email: email@example.com Counsel for Plaintiffs ELECTROGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC. and ELECTROGRAPH TECHNOLOGIES CORP. [Additional Counsel on Signature Line]
This Document Relates To Individual Case No. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND ELECTROGRAPH TECHNOLOGIES FOR DISMISSAL AND TO REPLY IN CORP., SUPPORT OF SAME
3:10-cv-00117-SI (N.D. Cal.)
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MITSUI MOTION FOR
Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies Corp. (collectively, "Electrograph") and Defendant Mitsui & Co (Taiwan), Ltd. ("Mitsui"), through the undersigned 3 counsel, request that the Court enter the following order to extend Electrograph's time to respond 4 to Mitsui's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Dismissal and Mitsui's time to reply in 5 support thereof. 6
WHEREAS Mitsui filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Dismissal ("Motion") on June 9, 2011 (MDL Dkt #2892);
WHEREAS the parties agree that Electrograph may have until July 8, 2011 to oppose or otherwise respond to the Motion and Mitsui may have until July 29, 2011 to reply in support of the Motion;
THEREFORE, Electrograph and Mitsui, by the undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Electrograph's opposition to the Motion shall be due on or before July 8, 2011.
2. Mitsui's reply shall be due on or before July 29, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that a true and correct copy
of the foregoing
document was electronically served upon the parties and counsel of
record through the Court's
ECF system on June 22, 2011
Dated: June 22, 2011
Philip J. Iovieno
Philip J. Iovieno
Attorney for Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies Corp.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.