Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Tft-Lcd (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation v. Epson Imaging Devices Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


June 24, 2011

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
ELECTROGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Y. Illston United States District Judge

Paul P. Eyre Ernest E. Vargo 2 Michael E. Mumford BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 3 PNC Center 1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200 4 Cleveland, OH 44114-3482 Telephone: (216) 621-0200 5 Facsimile: (216) 696-0740 peyre@bakerlaw.com 6 evargo@bakerlaw.com mmumford@bakerlaw.com 7 Tracy Cole BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza 9 New York, NY 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4210 10 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 tcole@bakerlaw.com 11 Attorneys for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.

This Document Relates to Individual Case Master File No. 3:07-md-1827-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE TO AUGUST 26, 2011 FOR MITSUI TAIWAN'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND FOR DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies Corp. (collectively, "Electrograph") and Defendant Mitsui & Co (Taiwan), Ltd. ("Mitsui Taiwan"), through the 3 undersigned counsel, request that the Court enter the following order continuing the hearing date 4 for Mitsui Taiwan's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Dismissal from August 5, 2011 to August 26, 2011.

WHEREAS, Mitsui Taiwan filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Dismissal ("Motion") on June 9, 2011 (MDL Dkt #2892); current hearing date for the Motion, August 5, 2011; providing that Electrograph may have until July 8, 2011 to oppose or otherwise respond to the #2945);

WHEREAS, counsel for Mitsui Taiwan has developed a scheduling conflict with the

WHEREAS, Electrograph has not yet opposed or otherwise responded to the Motion.

WHEREAS, the parties have filed a stipulation and proposed order with the Court Motion and Mitsui may have until July 29, 2011 to reply in support of the Motion (MDL Dkt

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have conferred regarding the hearing date, and Electrograph has no objection to moving the hearing date for the Motion to the next available 17 regular hearing date on which counsel for Electrograph is available, August 26, 2011.

agree to continue the hearing date for the Motion to August 26, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

THEREFORE, Electrograph and Mitsui, by the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the stipulating defendant. 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110624

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.