IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
June 24, 2011
HRL OF COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC., PLAINTIFF,
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge
NOT FOR CITATION
United States District Court
United States of America for Use and Benefit For the Northern District of California
(1) CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
(2) SETTING SHOW CAUSE HEARING RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
In September 2010, this Court stayed this case until February 22, 2011. Docket No. 40. On 18 that date, none of the parties appeared at a previously-scheduled Further Case Management 19 Conference. Later, this Court set another Further Case Management Conference for June 28, 2011 20 and ordered the parties to file a Joint Case Management Statement no later than June 21, 2011.
Docket No. 44.
Plaintiff has filed nothing since it moved to the stay the case in 2010. Defendants filed a Case Management Statement, and their counsel has stated that Plaintiff's counsel has been 24 unresponsive to his attempts at contact. Docket Nos. 45, 47. In light of these circumstances, the Further Case Management Conference, currently set for June 28, 2011, is continued to July 26, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2, Fifth Floor United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement no later than July 19, 2 2011.*fn1
In addition, Plaintiff is ORDERED to appear on July 26, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2,
Fifth Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California, 95113 to show 5 cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 24, 2011 9
C09-00509 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Carl Patrick Stoll firstname.lastname@example.org Timothy Joseph Nash email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.