Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

James Hampton v. Robert L. Ayers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 28, 2011

JAMES HAMPTON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT L. AYERS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Ronald S.W. Lew Senior United States District Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment filed on February 16, 2010, defendants' motions for summary judgment filed on January 2, 2010, and December 30, 2010, all of the records herein, the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and plaintiff's Objection to the Report filed on June 22, 2011. The Court has conducted a de novo review of those matters in the Report to which objections have been stated in writing. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations set forth in the Report.

IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

(2) Defendants' motions for summary judgment for summary judgment are granted, as set forth in the Report, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and

(3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice as to plaintiff's federal claims, and without prejudice as to plaintiff's state law claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110628

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.