UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 29, 2011
F.G. CROSTHWAITE AND RUSSELL E. BURNS, IN THEIR RESPECTIVE CAPACITIES AS TRUSTEES, ET AL.,
A PLUS MATERIALS AND RECYCLING, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Honorable Susan Illston
REQUEST TO VACATE / CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
Date: July 1, 2011 Time: 2:30 p.m. Ctrm: 10, 19th Floor
Plaintiffs herein respectfully request that the Case Management Conference, currently on calendar for July 1, 2011, be continued for approximately 60 -- 90 days.
1. As the Court's records will reflect, this action was filed on September 24, 2010, to compel Defendants Rodney Ray Lawley and A Plus Materials And Recycling, Inc. (which was 21 allegedly purchased by Defendant Recology, Inc.) to comply with their collective bargaining 22 agreement. Service on Defendants was effectuated on October 5, 2010 (Recology, Inc.) and 23 November 12, 2010 (Rodney Ray Lawley and A Plus Materials And Recycling, Inc.). 24
2. Having learned that Recology, Inc. is not indeed a successor to A Plus Materials And Recycling Inc., Plaintiffs prepared a Stipulation For Voluntary Dismissal As To Defendant 26 Recology, Inc., which was then executed by all of the parties, filed with the Court, and ultimately 27 signed by the Honorable Susan Illston on March 22, 2011. 28
3. The remaining parties were unable to reach a settlement.
4. The Court vacated the Case Management Conference set for March 25, 2011, as Plaintiffs anticipated preparing their Motion for Entry of Default Judgment following the 3 dismissal of Recology, Inc., and there were no issues that needed to be addressed by the Court. 4
5. Since that time, Plaintiff Trustees approved an overall change of liquidated damages and interest application, which may reduce Plaintiffs' claims. As a result, the Trust 6 Funds underwent a systemwide programming revision as to the calculation of interest and 7 liquidated damages, which was recently completed. Upon confirmation of amounts claimed due 8 in this action, Plaintiffs will prepare, file and serve their Motion for Default Judgment. 9
6. There are therefore no issues that need to be addressed at the currently scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court's time and 11 resources, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Case Management Conference, currently 12 scheduled for July 1, 2011, be vacated, or in the alternative be continued to either coincide with 13 the date to be set for the Motion, or continued for 90 days to allow completion of the Motion, 14 service, filing and disposition of the Motion. 15
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above entitled action, and that the foregoing is true of my own knowledge.
Executed this 21st day of June 2011, at San Francisco, California.
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION By: /S/ Blake E. Williams Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IT IS SO ORDERED. 22
Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case Management Conference and all related deadlines are hereby vacated. or Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case Management Conference is hereby continued to All related 10/7/11 at 3 P.M. deadlines are extended accordingly.
THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.