Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tony Roberts v. Matthew Cate

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 29, 2011

TONY ROBERTS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MATTHEW CATE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kendall J. Newman United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel. On June 22, 2011, the parties were reminded that discovery closed on June 8, 2011, but that once the court issued a ruling on defendants' motion for protective order, plaintiff could renew his motion to extend the discovery deadline. On June 27, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery responses, which plaintiff signed on June 20, 2011, prior to the issuance of the June 22, 2011 order. Plaintiff's motion to compel is untimely and will be denied without prejudice to its renewal should the court subsequently grant an extension of the discovery deadline. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's June 27, 2011 motion to compel (dkt. no. 57) is denied without prejudice.

20110629

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.