IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 30, 2011
TYRONE L. ADAMS, PLAINTIFF,
CHARLES L. EASLEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge
On April 6, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 6, 2011, are ADOPTED; and
2. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, Dckt. No. 4, is denied.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.