IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
July 1, 2011
PATRICK WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF,
J. CLARK KELSO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 4, 2011, the assigned district judge adopted the undersigned's March 9, 2011 findings and recommendations. In that order plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis was denied, plaintiff was granted thirty days to pay the requisite filing fee and was admonished that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.
The 30-day period set in the May 4, 2011 order has expired and plaintiff has not paid the required filing fee or otherwise responded to the order.
Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.